Post by 棘
今夜如此可人的月，却无可赏的心。我是不是刃地太深了？！
今夜如此可人的月，却无可赏的心。我是不是刃地太深了？！
披(pei一声)着外套🧥，走在路上，想着今年大大小小的事儿，扭头一看晃悠悠的影子，竟然有种焦裕禄的感觉。
用Kindle三年来，最优雅的一次越狱！
#kindle #Jailbreaking #越狱 #winterbreak
*原版Jailbreaking tutorial：https://kindlemodding.org/jailbreaking/
● 中文教程： https://bookfere.com/post/1145.html
● 越狱之后：https://bookfere.com/post/98.html
Post by 棘
朴美香的长笛独奏『科勒35首』，承包今日下班后的心情
https://open.spotify.com/track/6iLUJqwYjo0xeKLeHnx6yu?si=P4UnWtGMRiylqJJYl7P5SQ
朴美香的长笛独奏『科勒35首』，承包今日下班后的心情
https://open.spotify.com/track/6iLUJqwYjo0xeKLeHnx6yu?si=P4UnWtGMRiylqJJYl7P5SQ
Post by 棘
真是大意了。我以为他不告诉我是要保持不可替代性，实际上却是他太懒，以至于不想总结经验。。。。。。。
真是大意了。我以为他不告诉我是要保持不可替代性，实际上却是他太懒，以至于不想总结经验。。。。。。。
----------------------
ESO(@esoastronomy@astrodon.social) says:
Astronomers focus on the sky, but it’s worth looking around our planet, too! This image, for instance, was taken from Pukará de Quitor, a fortress built 900+ years ago by the Licán Antai community, also known as Atacameños, not far from the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. What a perfect frame for the Licancabur #volcano!
Learn more: https://www.eso.org/public/images/potw2501a/
📷 ESO/A. Ghizzi Panizza
#archaeology #astrodon #astronomy #science
----------------------
Foxes in Love(@FoxesInLove@social.neonpaws.digital) says:
#foxesInLove #comic
Source: https://foxes-in-love.tumblr.com/post/771921268892123136
Copyright: https://foxesinlove.net
Post by 棘
@atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org 强烈同意！
----------------------
Chris Trottier(@atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org) says:
Let me explain why I’m so adamant about owning my own social media server.
Back when Twitter was a thing—before Elon Musk—I remember it like it was yesterday. I owned a social media consultancy, and much of my work was tied to Twitter. I relied on it heavily.
One day, I was working for a client, and everything was going fine. We had just used Twitter the day before to host a hashtag chat. Engagement was strong, and things were happening. At the time, we were also working on a decentralized social media service, which may have played a significant role in what happened next.
During the chat, we discussed how centralized platforms can spread and even incentivize conspiracy theories. We used QAnon as an example to highlight the problems with algorithms.
The very next day, my client’s company was banned from Twitter. Completely shut down. His personal Twitter account was banned too. My consultancy? Banned. A bunch of unrelated hobby accounts I managed were also banned—including a Star Trek fan account I’d run for years.
For some reason, they didn’t outright ban my personal account, but they shadowbanned me. No matter what I tweeted, only 30 people would ever see it. And this was despite having 8,000 followers at the time. Twitter was intentionally rate-limiting the reach of my posts.
That’s when I had a stark realization: if I don’t own my social media accounts, I own nothing. I exist entirely at the whims of someone else.
I learned something crucial: paranoia. If you don’t own it, you can’t depend on it. If it’s not your data, it’s someone else’s data. If you don’t own your online identity, someone else will claim ownership and monetize it however they wish.
This is why, when I explore decentralized social media platforms, I always ask myself: how feasible is it for me to own the basic services? Ideally, everyone should be able to own their social media from start to finish—affordably and with confidence.
This is why I continue to run atomicpoet.org and why I’ve owned it for years now.
@atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org 强烈同意！
----------------------
Chris Trottier(@atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org) says:
Let me explain why I’m so adamant about owning my own social media server.
Back when Twitter was a thing—before Elon Musk—I remember it like it was yesterday. I owned a social media consultancy, and much of my work was tied to Twitter. I relied on it heavily.
One day, I was working for a client, and everything was going fine. We had just used Twitter the day before to host a hashtag chat. Engagement was strong, and things were happening. At the time, we were also working on a decentralized social media service, which may have played a significant role in what happened next.
During the chat, we discussed how centralized platforms can spread and even incentivize conspiracy theories. We used QAnon as an example to highlight the problems with algorithms.
The very next day, my client’s company was banned from Twitter. Completely shut down. His personal Twitter account was banned too. My consultancy? Banned. A bunch of unrelated hobby accounts I managed were also banned—including a Star Trek fan account I’d run for years.
For some reason, they didn’t outright ban my personal account, but they shadowbanned me. No matter what I tweeted, only 30 people would ever see it. And this was despite having 8,000 followers at the time. Twitter was intentionally rate-limiting the reach of my posts.
That’s when I had a stark realization: if I don’t own my social media accounts, I own nothing. I exist entirely at the whims of someone else.
I learned something crucial: paranoia. If you don’t own it, you can’t depend on it. If it’s not your data, it’s someone else’s data. If you don’t own your online identity, someone else will claim ownership and monetize it however they wish.
This is why, when I explore decentralized social media platforms, I always ask myself: how feasible is it for me to own the basic services? Ideally, everyone should be able to own their social media from start to finish—affordably and with confidence.
This is why I continue to run atomicpoet.org and why I’ve owned it for years now.
Post by 棘
----------------------
rain 🌦️(@rain@hachyderm.io) says:
Can you believe that the same group of older people who warned folks for years to "never cite wikipedia" now post whatever garbage AI just hallucinated
Actually I can believe that, because "never cite wikipedia" is exactly the kind of simplistic thought-terminating statement that prevents the formation of critical evaluation skills
----------------------
rain 🌦️(@rain@hachyderm.io) says:
Can you believe that the same group of older people who warned folks for years to "never cite wikipedia" now post whatever garbage AI just hallucinated
Actually I can believe that, because "never cite wikipedia" is exactly the kind of simplistic thought-terminating statement that prevents the formation of critical evaluation skills
Post by 棘
昨天故障了？！
昨天故障了？！
